SOMA Action Climate Athletic Field Working Group educates the public and local decision makers on the facts of natural turf grass versus synthetic / artificial turf. Working with communities from NJ and around the country, we continually assess the latest events and research.

Natural versus Artificial Turf

  • Installation: Artificial turf costs 3 - 10 times more to install than natural grass. In most cases, an existing grass field does not require “installation,” only renovation through improved maintenance.

    Maintenance:  When the cost of replacing the plastic rug every 10 years is factored in, maintaining an artificial turf field costs 2 - 10 times more per year than maintaining natural grass. (Here is a recent cost comparison, starting at 27:50. Also see References below.)

  • To prevent flooding and protect drinking water, NJDEP recently enacted new Stormwater Rules. These rules apply to new artificial turf, but not to existing grass fields.  Building a turf field will cost more because of new requirements to store and treat stormwater.  

    • NJDEP classifies artificial turf field as an impervious surface.  Since the base of a turf field is highly compacted during construction and is fitted with an underdrain, rain cannot soak into the ground and recharge the aquifer.

    • Turf fields are designed to shed water rapidly through their drain system.  However, municipal systems are “rarely able to accept directly the huge volumes of stormwater” draining from multi-acre turf fields. This means flow controls and storage ponds or underground tanks are necessary.  

    • Larger detention areas will now be required because

      • With climate change we expect 30% more rain in Essex County.

      • Storage areas must accommodate 100-year storm volumes.

      • New NJDEP rules require that, compared with the pre-existing grass fields, stormwater volume leaving the site must be reduced, groundwater recharge must be increased, and water quality must be improved.  

    Field location impacts stormwater management cost, and risk.  Sites at the bottom of slopes have higher water tables and receive more surface flow than hilltop sites. 

    • Surface flow from outside the project perimeter increases the volume which must be managed, and carries debris that can clog drainage.  An auxiliary drainage system may be required.

    • An elevated water table or substantial groundwater fluctuation reduces underground storage capacity, and can cause subsidence of the stone base of a turf field.

  • Usable hours

    • Turf field vendors claim fields can be used 3000 hours per year.

    • However, the main demand for playing fields in most communities is concentrated in the 10-12 week spring and fall youth sports seasons.  Since children are also in school at this time, field use is limited to after school and weekend.

    • Maximum scheduled field usage is thus 800-1500 hours/year.  

    • Well-maintained grass supports this level of use

    • Compare to other districts.

    image|sched-usage-compare|#

    Wet fields

    Heat

    • Heat reduces artificial turf usability. Grass is cooler.

    • In direct sunlight, surface temperatures of turf can reach 160F or more

    • A series of surface measurements of Underhill turf field and adjacent grass June-September 2024 found the artificial turf surface was reliably 50F hotter than grass.

    • To protect player health, some communities close turf fields when air temperature exceeds 85F and humidity is 60% or more.

    • Heat generated by artificial turf affects the temperature of nearby buildings, increasing the need for air conditioning. Trees and grass will require more water due to nearby turf.